The Sunday morning message, “A Crazy Prophet,” began in the second epistle of Peter. In this letter the apostle spoke of the “madness” of Balaam (2 Pet. 2:16). This foolish diviner was hot-tempered and violent, stubborn, and greedy. But why did Peter mention him?

       Peter's letter was a warning against false teachers who might take advantage of unsuspecting Christians. “False prophets also arose among the people,” Peter said, “just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies. […] And in their greed they will exploit you with false words” (2 Pet. 2:1, 3). Balaam (vs. 15-16) was a familiar OT example of a prophet who was more than willing to exploit God's people for personal gain.

       But a preacher today would never exploit a congregation, would he? Yes, Virginia, he would. A priest or pastor has strong financial incentives for staying the doctrinal course. Even if his diligent Bible study unearths dangerous cracks in the foundation of church teachings, he will probably decide that speaking the truth is too risky. A preacher, especially a man with extensive training, is usually ill-equipped to change professions. And immediately gaining employment with a church that embraces the truth is almost impossible. The man who has been proclaiming falsehood for years must prove himself before being entrusted with a pulpit. Thus, discovering the truth and resolving to preach it could mean the loss of insurance, salary, and housing.

       The social consequences could be traumatic too. A priest or pastor who learns the truth might shock and disappoint his mentors, lose his church friends, or even alienate his immediate family. Plus, he must suffer the indignity of admitting that he has been wrong.

       Even Gospel preachers are not free from the temptation to tickle ears instead of pricking hearts. Christians absolutely must study for themselves. That preacher on TV or in the pulpit may be completely sincere. Then again, he may be exploiting his audience.